Dating Results Point to a Young Earth

Dating results point to young earth

90% of Dating Results Point to a Young Earth!


Most people do not realize it, but over 90% of dating results point to a young earth. However, evolution rejects the 90% and only acknowledges the 10%. In one year, 21,000 carbon-14 specimens were submitted and 19,000 were rejected.

Only 2,000 were considered accurate by evolutionist. Why? 
“If life had evolved into its wondrous profusion of creatures little by little, then one would expect to find fossils of transitional creatures which were a bit like what went before them and a bit like what came after. But no one has yet found any evidence of such transitional creatures. This oddity has been attributed to gaps in the fossil record that gradualists expected to fill when rock strata of the proper age had been found. In the last decade, however, geologists have found rock layers of all divisions of the last 500 million years and no transitional forms were contained in them.” (Eldrege, Niles. The Guardian Weekly, 26. November 1978, vol. 119, no. 22, p. 1.)

It is the clear testimony of the Bible that “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth,” Gen. 1:1. The only account of the origin of the universe and life on planet earth is the written record of the first book of the Bible. All else concerning the creation of the universe and all living organisms is clearly delineated in the Genesis account.

The evidence we see all around us is confirmed in the biblical record. Every living thing reproduces “after its own kind.” All living creatures are genetically pre-programmed by DNA to reproduce just as the Creator designed them. Even though our DNA is programmed with a mechanism to correct problems with the system, e.g. mutations, sometimes mutations do occur leaving the organism, not more likely, but less likely to be able to survive.

The more we discover on the level of molecular biology, the more evidence we have for the intelligent design of all living systems. When all the evidence is uncovered and assimilated, the writers of the Bible finds themselves being vindicated by this same evidence.

In any case, the veracity of the Bible is constantly being tested and vindicated by the discoveries of true science and not the pseudo-science known today as the Theory of Evolution. 

Genesis explains the formation of the earth’s crust more plausibly than evolution.

How the earth (and other planets) began is still an open question in evolutionary circles. Evolutionists agree that the earth was formed about 4.6 billion years ago, starting from a very hot gaseous state and eventually cooling down.

Creationists maintain that the earth began with the Creator who miraculously formed the crust of the earth on the third day by separating the land from the water, as is stated in Genesis.

“And God said, ‘Let the waters under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.’ And it was so. God called the dry ground ‘land,’ and the gathered waters he called ‘seas.’ And God saw it was good.” Genesis 1:9

Evolutionists criticize creationists on the grounds for what they consider an unreasonable and unintelligent faith in the Word of God. The critics fail to recognize that the Word of God is the “logos,” the “intelligence” of the universe. Genesis 1:9, above, demonstrates this. It emphasizes the separation of the land from the sea, which could also be understood as the separation of a solid landmass from a liquid water medium.

Chemists define the formation of crystals as a process in which the salts that are dissolved in liquid medium separate and form a solid crystal at set conditions. It is interesting to note that granite rock is made up of four different types of minerals, each with a unique crystalline structure.

One could logically propose, then, that as God separated the land from the water, massive foundational rock structures were formed. Nobody can be sure because no one knows exactly the process God used. However, the proposition that God used this separation of solid from liquid makes better scientific sense than the evolutionist’s hot gas.

The process by which rocks and minerals are made—the separation of solid from water—can be observed today. Rock comes from the earth’s magma, which is a molten fluid inside the earth. Magma is composed of various metals and oxygen compounds. Along with these compounds is locked-up water vapor under tremendous pressure and heat. For magma to become rock, it must cool by coming to the surface. The heat of the magma causes rock above it to melt, allowing the magma closer to the surface. The magma cools before breaking the top layer and forms a crystalline hard rock. Granite is a great example of this rock formation. Another way magma comes to the surface is by an exploding volcano. The magma, once it abruptly breaks the surface of the earth, is called “lava.” It comes out of the volcano with a great amount of steam and as it flows onto the surface of the earth, it begins to cool and eventually hardens. “Obsidian” is an example of rock formed from lava.

It is important to note that locked-up water vapor had an important role in making crystalline rock. The minerals that were formed went through a complicated process, combining and recombining, to form a stable chemical structure. As the minerals cooled, the separation of water from solid continued, until different kinds of minerals mixed, forming the rocks we observe today. It is obvious in the formation of a basic rock type that there is separation of water and solid. This is an observed scientific fact.

When we look at the earth’s crust—this massive exterior shell—we can only marvel at the creative force that made it. Is this the result of random gaseous elemental collisions, which over millions of years formed the rocks we see today? Or is this evidence of the workmanship of an intelligent designer? Did God purposely leave us a model of rock formation in the magma and lava of the earth that would lead to His Word? Is the principle of separation of solid from water, or “land” from the “seas,” a more intelligent alternative than what we are being taught today? The evidence speaks loudly and clearly and points to a Creator God.

- See more at:

Dzik, J (2007). The Verdun Syndrome: simultaneous origin of protective armour and infaunal shelters at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition, in Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Komarower, Patricia, The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota, Special publications, 286, London: Geological Society, pp. 405–414.

Fedonkin, M.A. (1992). Vendian faunas and the early evolution of Metazoa. In Lipps, J., and Signor, P. W.. Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa. New York: Springer. pp. 87–129.

Gould, Stephen Jay, & Eldredge, Niles (1977). “Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered.” Paleobiology 3 (2): 115-151.

Hamer, Gene (2005). The God Gene: How Faith is Hardwired into our Genes. New York, NY: Doubleday  

Heartland Institute (2006). Climate Variance No Crisis, Says Senate Committee Chair. Accessed 1.3.13.

Loflin, Lewis (2012). Origins of modern environmental religion. Accessed 1.3.13.

Pasteur, Louis (1879). Pasteur's Papers on the Germ Theory. The Physiological Theory Of Fermentation, Louis Pasteur, Trans. F. Faulkner & D. C. Robb. The Germ Theory And Its Applications To Medicine And Surgery, Mm. Pasteur, Jourbert & Chamberland, Trans. H. C. Ernst, M. D. On The Extension Of The Germ Theory To The Etiology Of Certain Common Diseases, Louis Pasteur, Trans. H. C. Ernst, M. D. Accessed 1.10.13.

Strick, James (April 15, 2001). Evolution & The Spontaneous Generation. Continuum International Publishing Group. Bristol, England: Theommes Press, pp. xi–xxiv.    

White, Lynn (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Accessed 1.3.13.

Wikipedia (2013). Biogenesis. It should be noted that the term abiogenesis Accessed 1.10.13. The word employed by evolutionists has also evolved. The current popular term for the spontaneous generation of life from non-living materials is biopoesis.

- See more at: